History
A History Lesson in Key Stage 3
Although no one history lesson can ever be like all the others, it is important to ensure
that certain key features reappear regularly and reliably in most lessons.
These key features
are not there merely to satisfy an anonymous expert's view of an "ideal" lesson structure.
They need to be there in order to address particular difficulties faced by many pupils
learning history, and to provide them with the strategies and confidence to make progress.
Most pupils are both interested in and confident with describing the chronology of
historical events and the key features of historical periods.
Many of them struggle, however,
with the interpretation of historical sources and ascribing more adult notions of political
motivation to historical characters.
As a result, too often, they find it difficult to use their
historical knowledge selectively and in context in order to make and justify historical
arguments.
They are, in general, confident with historical facts but tentative, colloquial and
imprecise when engaging in speculative discussion.
The structure of a typical history lesson is designed to recognise these common difficulties
and address them.
The seating plan for the lesson is crucial. A horseshoe shaped layout of
the desks enables pupils to face one another, listen to the comments of their classmates
and respond directly to them where appropriate.
Pupils can all see the teacher easily during
exposition but, equally importantly, they can all see one another when dialogue is needed.
The teacher introduces the lesson by explaining the learning objectives. These need to be
referred to frequently throughout the lesson, so it may help to have them written on the
board or OHP.
The objectives, crucially, will be expressed in terms of what the pupils will
learn and not the activities they will do.
Beyond this starting point between half and two thirds of the lesson will typically be
directed through strong and focused teaching.
This would include the introductory phase,
direct teaching of new information, careful modelling of new skills or techniques and a
plenary which draws together the main learning points.
Between one third to half of the
lesson will be taken up by more pupil-centred activities including independent practice,
paired or group work and, most importantly, dialogue and discussion.
The teacher directs
and manages each of these phases but uses different skills and techniques for each.
The
techniques used, however, are repeated and re-used frequently over time so that the pupils
become familiar with the expectations of them and confident learners of the necessary
methodologies.
During the main teaching phase of the lesson the teacher will explain new information or demonstrate and model new techniques.
The teacher will not rely solely upon the spoken
word, but will use the board or OHP to record and structure the key points of what has
been said.
Often the teacher will model the process of constructing a logical argument on
the board, pointing out to the pupils both the use of factual evidence and appropriate
linking words or phrases.
These may range from the very simple (such as "because" or "as a
result") to the more complex (such as "some historians argue that" or "this contradicts the
evidence of").
Questioning for comprehension will be a strong element of the central teaching phase. The
teacher will expect pupils to respond to factual questions in full sentences, using the correct
vocabulary.Very few one-word answers will be appropriate.
The teacher will insist on
audibility, asking pupils to repeat sentences where necessary. The teacher will not routinely
repeat or reinterpret inaudible answers as to do so would reinforce the notion, on the part
of pupils, that they do not have to listen to their classmates' answers but only to the
teacher.
Where more complex, speculative, answers are required the teacher will pause
(often for about 5-7 seconds) to give all the pupils an opportunity to reflect. Rather than
accept the first answer given, the teacher takes several alternative answers from different
pupils.
The teacher does this without commenting or passing judgement on each answer as,
to do so, discourages pupils from continuing to speculate. Once several answers have been
heard, however, the teacher spends time teasing out the implications or contradictions in
what has been said.
Often the board will be used to record, shape or structure the
emerging argument because some pupils will continue to find the apparent acceptance of
contradictory points confusing.
During the independent practice phase of the lesson a wide variety of activities is possible.
This could include individual, paired or small group tasks. Importantly, however, the teacher
will make clear the links between these tasks, the learning objectives of the lesson and the
direct teaching that preceded the task.
The teacher will also make clear the expectation that
pupils will, in their work, mirror the standard or the technique that the teacher modelled
for them.
The teacher manages the whole class discussion phase very carefully.
Individual pupils or
small groups will frequently be brought to the front of the class to present their findings.
Where this happens, the teacher will begin with the most able or confident pupils so that
those who are less confident will be able to see more clearly what is expected when they
have to talk.
Because of the central importance of this part of the lesson the teacher will
have established, over time, ground rules which deter other pupils from making negative
or unhelpful comments.
At all times the teacher reinforces the need for pupils to speak audibly, in sentences and use appropriate vocabulary.
No one group is allowed to dominate
discussion but pupils will be encouraged to comment on their classmates' contributions, for
example by asking for clarification or suggesting alternative points.
Over time and in the
classes where oral confidence has been developed, spontaneous discussions will probably
take place.
The lesson concludes by refocusing on the learning objectives.
A variety of techniques are
used for this ranging from direct teacher summary, through to inviting pupils to make
reflective comments designed to assess whether or not the objectives have been met.
Home|
Introduction|
The Context in Barking and Dagenham|
The key principles|
Putting the principles into practice|
Principles|
Implications for teachers|
Impact for all pupils|
How do pupils experience?|
Exemplification in Subjects|
English|
Mathematics|
Science|
Art|
DT|
Geography|
History|
MFL|
Music|
PE|
RE|
PSHE|
ICT|